Rendered at 09:03:47 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
fjdjshsh 5 hours ago [-]
I doubt there any reasonable people outside the USA that still think Trump's regime is reasonable.
Reasonable people of the USA, why would anyone still think this regime is OK? Please explain as I'm completely dumbfounded
bad_username 2 hours ago [-]
Person outside the USA here (reasonable, hopefully).
First off, it is too simplistic to try and categorize a political regime as "ok" or "not ok". A political regime, the problematics of a large country, and and a huge voting base of people like the US population, are an extremely complex phenomenon. One will not reach useful insights by labeling a regime as "not OK" and its voters as unintelligent or evil (I am not saying you are doing so, but lots of people do).
Talking about reasonable people: for reasonable people, the Trump regime, and any regime for that matter, is a mixed bag of things to like and dislike, to weigh and trade off. For sure, for each reasonable person the scales will tip in different directions. But for a reasonable voter this not a sports game where one roots for their team just because it's their team.
For many reasonable voters Trump is not "ok" or maybe even "good", but he still responds to some of their pressing priorities and concerns enough that he merits voting for. I personally voted for politicians in my country that I disliked deeply, but I'd done the calculus and concluded that the alternatives are worse. Similarly, you shouldn't conclude that the electorate of Trump predominantly loves him. You hear mostly from the loud MAGA crowd, but they do not decide.
What are the concerns and priorities that may force a reasonable person to hold their nose and vote for someone like Trump? I wouldn't like to engage in a political debate here, so I will keep things meta. But as an outsider I can see political and social trends of the last decade that are quite prominent, rather sudden, pretty radical from my vantage point, and concerning to conceivably reasonable voters enough to tip the scale, even if you or I may not really align with them specifically.
toast0 4 hours ago [-]
> Reasonable people of the USA, why would anyone still think this regime is OK?
What do you want reasonable people to do if the regime is not OK?
anon48293 3 hours ago [-]
Speak out, as they have been doing.
Use this time to come together, organise, and formulate proper vision for a widespread moderate political debate; I feel there are too many extremes in US politics on either side.
dzonga 10 hours ago [-]
ministry of truth.
those r the versions or the truth the gvt wants you to see.
goatlover 12 hours ago [-]
Even if it was in the ballpark of 24,000 non-citizens, Trump lost the 2020 popular vote by over 7 million. Are we supposed to believe those 24,000 were distributed just right in the swing states to win Biden the electoral college? It's statistically implausible.
Are we also supposed to believe this number (if it were close accurate) is supposed to be a concern for the midterms somehow? That a bunch of non-citizens will happen to concentrate their vote in close midterm elections likely in red states that would flip the Congress?
iAMkenough 12 hours ago [-]
Yes, you’re supposed to believe that while simultaneously believing it wasn’t a concern while Biden was president during the 2024 election and that those results are rock solid compared to 2020.
Seriously, don’t look into the 2024 results AT All. Only 2020, please. This is why we’re defunding election security.
First off, it is too simplistic to try and categorize a political regime as "ok" or "not ok". A political regime, the problematics of a large country, and and a huge voting base of people like the US population, are an extremely complex phenomenon. One will not reach useful insights by labeling a regime as "not OK" and its voters as unintelligent or evil (I am not saying you are doing so, but lots of people do).
Talking about reasonable people: for reasonable people, the Trump regime, and any regime for that matter, is a mixed bag of things to like and dislike, to weigh and trade off. For sure, for each reasonable person the scales will tip in different directions. But for a reasonable voter this not a sports game where one roots for their team just because it's their team.
For many reasonable voters Trump is not "ok" or maybe even "good", but he still responds to some of their pressing priorities and concerns enough that he merits voting for. I personally voted for politicians in my country that I disliked deeply, but I'd done the calculus and concluded that the alternatives are worse. Similarly, you shouldn't conclude that the electorate of Trump predominantly loves him. You hear mostly from the loud MAGA crowd, but they do not decide.
What are the concerns and priorities that may force a reasonable person to hold their nose and vote for someone like Trump? I wouldn't like to engage in a political debate here, so I will keep things meta. But as an outsider I can see political and social trends of the last decade that are quite prominent, rather sudden, pretty radical from my vantage point, and concerning to conceivably reasonable voters enough to tip the scale, even if you or I may not really align with them specifically.
What do you want reasonable people to do if the regime is not OK?
Use this time to come together, organise, and formulate proper vision for a widespread moderate political debate; I feel there are too many extremes in US politics on either side.
those r the versions or the truth the gvt wants you to see.
Are we also supposed to believe this number (if it were close accurate) is supposed to be a concern for the midterms somehow? That a bunch of non-citizens will happen to concentrate their vote in close midterm elections likely in red states that would flip the Congress?
Seriously, don’t look into the 2024 results AT All. Only 2020, please. This is why we’re defunding election security.